(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.20 2016고정1255

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.20 2016고정1255

일반교통방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is a member of the Gu-U.S. branch D branch office of the Gu-U.S. headquarters of the Gu-U.S. M. M. M.

On April 18, 2015, from around 15:00 to 16:30 of the same day, the Defendant participated in an assembly of the “National Assembly” with the participation of 10,000 people in the 4:16 jointly and severally organized from Seoul Square-ro, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul to 16:30 of the same day.

After the end of the assembly, the participants 6,00 in the assembly moved along the lane from 16:30 to 19:00 on the same day to 8-lane in the luminous language square, and occupied the previous lane to 2 A and the safe-dong depending on the side wall, Cheong River, etc. with the side wall, and occupied the front lane from 18:20 to 19:00 on the same day to 19:00 on the same day, thereby hindering the traffic of the vehicle.

Defendant in collusion with the participants in the above assembly in collusion with the participants in the assembly at around 16:40 on the same day, and interfered with the traffic of the road, and the Defendant did not know that it was difficult for the participants in the assembly to know whether or not the assembly report was made or the report was made as a mere participant in the assembly, and that it was moved to India immediately after 16:30 on the end of the assembly. The Defendant asserted that it cannot be viewed as a joint principal offender for public traffic interference.

The place of assembly reported on an outdoor assembly report was Seoul Squa, and a happy was not reported. Accordingly, the Seoul Squa was installed with P/L lines (public order maintenance lines) at the Seoul Squa (information situation report), and the participants in the assembly were installed with viewing letters.

In light of the fact that the defendant attempted to enter the market by using the P/L damage, the above argument is difficult to accept even if the defendant is a simple participant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A report on an outdoor assembly;

1. Illegal actors’ photographic materials, photo-book files by front time zone, and opticalized squaress;

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.23 2016고정313

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.08 2016고정2045

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.07 2016고정1959

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.22 2016고정397

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.27 2016고단6348