1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of ruling;

A. The Plaintiff is a person who was the owner of B, 3,415 square meters (hereinafter “B”) prior to B, C, 2,526 square meters (hereinafter “C”) and D, and 1,078 square meters prior to D (hereinafter “each of the said lands”).

B. On December 30, 2004, the Minister of Construction and Transportation announced E on December 30, 2004, pursuant to Articles 4 and 11 of the former Urban Development Act (amended by Act No. 8376 of Apr. 11, 2007; hereinafter “former Urban Development Act”), designated an urban development zone and a project implementer as follows. Each of the instant land was included in the said urban development zone.

The name of an urban development zone: The location and area of the F Urban Development Zone: G of the Chungcheongnam-nam, the 1,530,000 square meters of the G of the Chungcheongnam-nam, the H G of the G: The President of the Korea Land Corporation.

C. On December 26, 2006, the Minister of Construction and Transportation revised the size of an urban development zone as first announcement of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation with regard to “F urban development zone” designated as an urban development zone, and formulated a development plan.

The development plan includes a detailed list of land subject to expropriation or use, and each land of this case was also publicly announced as land subject to expropriation or use. D.

On December 21, 2009, the Defendant filed an application with the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs for change of district designation, change of development plan, and authorization of implementation plan in relation to F Urban Development Project. On August 27, 2012, the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs announced J in the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs for change of urban development zones, establishment of development plan, and implementation plan. Each of the instant lands

E. The Defendant applied for adjudication to the Central Land Expropriation Committee because it did not reach an agreement with the Plaintiff for the acquisition of each of the instant lands.

The Central Land Tribunal shall have three stables constructed on the land B and C on March 20, 2014 (hereinafter “the instant stable”).