1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The defendant is the party as follows, and the plaintiff is the owner of land B, 1272 square meters in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City (hereinafter "the land in this case").

On October 24, 2006, pursuant to Articles 3 and 4 of the former Urban Development Act (amended by Act No. 8970 of Mar. 21, 2008), the Defendant announced the designation of urban development zones and the establishment of a development plan for urban development zones (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project zone”) as follows, and publicly announced the designation and development plan (Seoul Metropolitan City E).

Designation of Urban Development Zones and formulation and public announcement of development plans therefor.

1. Name of an urban development zone: C district urban development project zone;

2. Location and area of an urban development zone: The area of F,G and H daily area in Gwangju Mine-gu: 611,000 square meters.

5. Period and method of implementation of an urban development project: The execution method from the authorization date of implementation plan to December 30, 2010: the Defendant, which announced the modification of a development plan and implementation plan under the Urban Development Act, on January 24, 2007, changed the land use plan and infrastructure plan for the urban development project of a district (hereinafter “instant project”), and publicly notified the details of authorization of implementation plan as follows (the announcement I of Gwangju Metropolitan City; hereinafter “instant implementation plan”).

Authorization of an execution plan shall be granted.

1. Project title: Urban development project of C district;

3. Location and area of an urban development zone: The area of F,G and H daily area in Gwangju Mine-gu: 611,000 square meters.

4. Implementers: The location of the defendant: Seo-gu in Gwangju.

5. Period: The method of construction from January 24, 2007 to December 30, 2010: the reservation of the implementation of the project in this case and the alteration of the project period by the method of land substitution under the Urban Development Act shall be reasonable to implement the project following the recent excessive supply of housing and real estate ties with respect to the project in this case on November 10, 208.