The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In full view of the summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding), the statements of the victim, E, and police officers, the status of the receipt and handling of the case and the accident, the status of 112 emergency medical services and emergency medical records, etc., despite the fact that the defendant could be found to have inflicted an injury on the victim by damaging the victim beyond the victim as stated in the facts charged, the court below acquitted the defendant of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts, which affected the conclusion

2. The lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim as stated in the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

The following circumstances are revealed by the victim's statement in the court below and the court below's reasoning that "the victim's statement was credibility enough to exclude reasonable doubt as to the facts charged in light of the relationship between the defendant and the victim, the background leading up to the dispute, the situation prior to the victim's beyond the victim's identity, the time of the victim's complaint and the reason for the complaint. ② The victim's statement at the time of this case was reported to the court below 112 on the ground that the victim interfered with his/her duties such as assault, etc. ② The first first responder's statement in the 119 first responder's first responder's first responder's statement in the 119 first responder's first responder's statement in the court below, and Q. who was dispatched to the scene at the time of this case was stated as "the victim caused a light."