1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasons for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following additional judgments, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Defendants asserts to the effect that additional determination is merely a document stating that the status of the deceased was reported and concealed without any specific grounds, such as the record book of emergency patients prepared by the Jeonnam University Hospital (Evidence No. 3-1), the report on the situation report prepared by the chief of the Eup/Myeon Police Station (Evidence No. 8-2), the first-aid services log No. 8-27, the first-aid services log (Evidence No. 8-27), the report on the investigation report prepared by the Jeonnam Police Agency (Evidence No. 8-28, and the report on the investigation report No. 112 (Evidence No. 9-2), and the report on the handling of the case No. 9-2.

However, in the first-aid service log prepared by 119 first-aid units, "the person who attempted to kill the person".

b. On the spot, it is indicated that there was awareness of the deceased at the time, and there was a sense of being the deceased at that time. The statement to the effect that the deceased attempted to live is indicated in the contents of the deceased, and also, in the record book of the preparation of an emergency patient at the Jeonnam University Hospital, “Woo-man and his own statement, she bre and put him in bret and her body according to his body according to his or her own statement.”

In light of the fact that the words are clearly distinguished from the horses, witnesses, and the people themselves on the record of an emergency patient, it is deemed that those who prepared the record of an emergency patient have laid fire on their own from the deceased.

In this case where there is no reason to believe that the first responder or the person who prepared the record book of emergency patients have a considerable credibility in describing the above first responder or the first responder or the first responder's record book, etc.

3. Accordingly, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate. Thus, the defendants' appeal is groundless.