Text
Defendant
B The Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, and a fine of KRW 500,000, respectively.
The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
To the extent that it does not materially disadvantage Defendant A’s exercise of the right of defense of Defendant B, “2017 High Court Decision 1762,” the part of Defendant A conspired with Defendant A was revised.
D) On April 13, 2015, C was dismissed from office at the branch of the sub-branch of the Namyang-si Branch on December 30, 2015, and was appointed on May 11, 2015 as the sub-branch of the sub-branch, E was appointed on June 15, 2015, and E was appointed as the sub-branch on July 29, 2016, and the sub-branch of the sub-branch of the sub-branch of the sub-branch of the sub-branch of the sub-branch of the sub-branch of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter of the sub-chapter.
On the other hand, since the above Namyang-si Branch did not have the position of the site president, A was not the site president, D was registered as a resident under the articles of association and the member regulations, and D was registered as a branch having the jurisdiction over the place of residence where it actually resides, and Defendant B was not the head of the sub-branch, and Defendant B was not the member of the sub-branch in the above Namyang-si Branch. Since Defendant B transferred his resident registration to another sub-branch on October 27, 2016, Defendant B could not be the member of the sub-branch in the above Nam-si branch, and Defendant B was not the head of the sub-branch, and Defendant B was not the head of the sub-branch.
Nevertheless, on February 3, 2017, Defendant B declared that the expulsion of C was null and void at the Seoul Southern District Court, and Defendant B arbitrarily prepared a written request for membership lottery for C in the name of the head of the branch of the branch of the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, with the seal reported to E, who is the president of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of
1. Defendant B is a computer without authority for the purpose of uttering at the office of the branch office of the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, the second floor D on February 9, 2017.