(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.12.14 2017가합12788

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.12.14 2017가합12788

징계처분 무효 확인

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is an incorporated City/Do Association under C, and the Plaintiff is a member of the instant sub-branch that submitted a written resignation notice on August 31, 2017, when it appears that the name of the instant sub-branch was used in combination with “branch” or “sub-branch” (hereinafter referred to as “instant sub-branch”). However, the Plaintiff is a member of the instant sub-branch that submitted the written resignation notice.

B. On August 14, 2017, E, the president of the instant branch, submitted a letter of resignation, and such letter of resignation was accepted to the Defendant on August 16, 2017.

Nevertheless, the instant branch was sent to the F Headquarters on August 22, 2017, and to the Defendant on August 24, 2017 under the name of “H Center” to the head of the F Center, but it appears that the branch head of the instant sub-branch is the affiliated organization of the instant sub-branch.

The paper sent a letter to the president or the chief of the branch.

C. On August 30, 2017, the instant subdivision held the first emergency board of directors (hereinafter “the instant board of directors”) on August 30, 2017, and the instant board of directors, at the meeting of G, passed a resolution on the agenda to be elected as an acting director for the president of the instant branch meeting.

On September 12, 2017, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the purport that “When appointing the acting director of the branch, the provisions of this Sub-chapter shall be simple, and the City/Do Association shall be notified without the prior approval procedure of the City/Do Association, and the guidance of the acting director of the sub-branch shall be sent to each sub-branch under the name of the head of the sub-branch without the approval of the City/Do Association.”

E. On September 19, 2017, the Defendant held a punishment committee for the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant punishment committee”), and the Plaintiff was present at the instant punishment committee to state his/her opinion.

The Disciplinary Committee of the instant case resolved on the Plaintiff’s “the warning (two (two) and the political (four).”

F. The defendant

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2019.05.31 2018가합51200

-수원지방법원 2014.11.18 2013가합22778

-수원지방법원 2014.11.18 2014가합4777

-의정부지방법원 2018.02.22 2017고정1762

-수원지방법원 2018.08.22 2018가합10916