logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.06.19 2018고단1849
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the prosecution against the victim B is instituted.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 10:50 on May 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) reported on May 10, 2018 to the effect that “B” restaurant in Jeju-si is “B,” and (b) reported on 112, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes by walking at the right side of the instant restaurant, which is a police officer belonging to the Jeju-dong Police Station D Zone D District in the Jeju-dong Police Station, and called “Is that I will bring about it,” and then, the Defendant would go to the above E on the ground that “Is you would see” and “Is you would go to the Defendant,” and the Defendant would go to B, who was a customer of the said restaurant.

On September 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 23:10 on September 7, 2018, the second floor of the F building in Jeju-si, attempted to assault the husband of the victim with a large voice without any special reason while under the influence of alcohol; (b) assault the victim on the part of the victim’s entrance alcohol and the part of the right direction.

around 10:40 on January 4, 2019, the Defendant driven the K Poter vehicle under the influence of alcohol of about 0.133% in the section of approximately 20km of blood alcohol content from the J farming association corporation located in Seopopo City I to the color landfill of about 1241 Doo-ro 145, Seopo-nam-ro 1241.5.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 1849"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Lritten statements;

1. On-site-related photographs "2018 Highest 2966";

1. Each legal statement of witness G and M;

1. The police statement of M;

1. G statements;

1. The relevant defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that there is no assault against the victim G, such as the above facts constituting the crime, but in the investigative agency of the victim G and this court.

arrow