Yellow Rappy

Chungcheongnam-do City, Chungcheongnam-do (Attorney Chang Chang-mo, Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

September 24, 2004

Daejeon District Court Decision 2002Guhap1559 Delivered on December 10, 2003

1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

The decision of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's decision on April 29, 2002 against the plaintiff (appointed party; hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff") and the designated parties shall be revoked. The decision of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for this court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: "A evidence 1" in Paragraph 1 (1) 1 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as "A No. 1"; "E. 1" in Paragraph 1 (a) of Article 1; "E. 2-A. (2)" in Paragraph 9 of Article 2 shall be deemed as "a good amount"; "relevant Acts and subordinate statutes" in subparagraph 3-e. 4 of Article 3 shall be deemed as "related Acts and subordinate statutes"; "fairness" in subparagraph 4-b) 14 of Article 4-c. 15 (Act No. 10, No. 15) shall be deemed as "high amount"; and "high amount" shall be deemed as "high amount"; and Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 (2) of the Civil Procedure Act shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 (2) of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the plaintiff.

[Attachment List of Appointed]

Judges Kim Yong-Hun (Presiding Judge)