Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Around 14:00 on March 28, 2015, the Defendant participated in the “Resolution Resolution for the Overall Force of the Public Officials Pension Enhancement” organized by the “Joint Party for the Prevention of Meritorious of Public Pension,” which was held by the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Culture Mar. 28, 2015.

Since then, the Defendant, along with 5,00 people who participated in the above assembly from 16:15 to 17:07 on the same day, occupied one 5-lanes in the E-Mapo Road as well as five-lanes in the E-Mapo Road as they go to the E-Mapo Road, and flaged with a banner, and flagddddddddd, and flaged by the police at a point of 50 meters in the E-Mapo Road, prevented vehicles from using the way of raising relief by moving the entire five-lanes.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with the above participants in the assembly and interfered with traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. D's written confirmation;

1. A report on an outdoor assembly;

1. On-site photographs;

1. On the face of the notification of illegal progress (the dismissed and defense counsel did not know of the fact that the demonstration was beyond the reported route at the time, and thus did not know of the intention or illegality of the general traffic obstruction. However, according to each of the above evidence, it is acknowledged that the police officer assigned to the scene of the maintenance of order at the time gave warning that the demonstration constituted an illegal demonstration beyond the reported scope. In light of these circumstances, it is difficult to view that the defendant was unaware of the fact that the demonstration was beyond the reported scope at the time. The defendant and defense counsel’s assertion does not accept the defendant and defense counsel’s assertion).

1. Articles 185 and 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine for the crime;

1. The defendant's access to the road as stated in the judgment with the demonstration team after participating in a large number of the reasons for the sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in the workhouse.