logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.06.23 2017고정372
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of K3 vehicles.

1. On December 25, 2016, the Defendant driven BK 3 vehicles under the influence of alcohol content of 0.080% in blood, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.080%, from the Han-gu Han-dong, Ulsan-gu, Busan-do, Samsan-do to the front road of the D shooting distance in C.

2. Defendant 1 violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (domain sentence) (D), at the time of a daylight of the above “1,” the roads prior to the “D” located in Ulsan-gu, Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu, Daejeon-gu, Ling off from the modern sea level, was straighted as the department room.

Since there is no signal signal, it was an intersection that does not support the traffic control, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has reduced the speed or temporarily stop and cross-vehicles the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not properly look at the traffic in other directions while under the influence of alcohol concentration among blood transfusions exceeding the statutory figures, and spokeed the front part of the vehicles damaged by the Espoon, which are directly linked to the modern department store room from the inncheon Seaside to the same intersection.

Thus, the defendant suffered injury to the victim F (the remaining and the age of 26) who was on board the driver's seat of the Espo vehicle, which is a damaged vehicle due to the above occupational negligence, for a two-day period of medical treatment, and even if he was on board the steering seat of the same damaged vehicle, he was on board the victim G (the age of 33) with the victim G (the age of 33) who was on board the same damaged vehicle for two-day medical treatment, but did not immediately get off the vehicle and escape without taking measures such as providing relief to the victims.

3. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “Non-accident”) by the Defendant, as the act referred to in the preceding 2 “2”, destroyed the damaged vehicle by shocking the pan-motor vehicle in front of the Espo vehicle, which is the damaged vehicle, thereby damaging the damaged vehicle’s property worth KRW 385,38.

arrow