beta
Text
1. The plaintiff B's lawsuit dismissed the part of the claim for nullification of each removal.
2. The defendant limited to the plaintiff A.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The parties are educational foundations that establish and operate a D University and E University.
Plaintiff
A was appointed as D University chemical engineering and assistant professor on September 1, 1991, and on April 1, 2002, the Plaintiff B was promoted as regular professor on April 1, 2002. On March 1, 1990, the Plaintiff B was appointed as D University Environmental Energy Engineering and Assistant professor on April 1, 200, and was promoted as regular professor on April 1, 2003.
B. On December 5, 2013, the Defendant’s president requested the Committee for Disciplinary Measures against the Plaintiffs to the Committee on Disciplinary Measures against the Korea University on January 9, 2014. Accordingly, on December 30, 2013, the Committee for Disciplinary Measures against the Plaintiff A against the Plaintiff, and on December 31, 2013, on December 31, 2013, the Committee for Disciplinary Measures against the Plaintiff B against each of the following disciplinary grounds, and accordingly, on January 9, 2014, the Defendant decided on each of the disciplinary measures against the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “the primary disciplinary measures”).
(1) On February 1, 2009, Plaintiff A et al., with F professor F (hereinafter “G farm”), voluntarily cleared the land for education owned by the school from February 2009, and had the public sell or cultivate the land in the general public, and deposited and manage the land at KRW 50,000 per capita’s personal account using the Plaintiff’s personal account (based on five square meters). On August 20, 2012, F professor, who was jointly managed due to the use of the land for education without permission on August 20, 2012, was subject to the disposition of taking disciplinary action (based on one month of salary and one-month of rent, and it is legally impossible to sell or cultivate the land through voluntary clearing of the land for education after 2013, without being informed of such fact to members, and notified Plaintiff A of the fact that the sale price was transferred from the Plaintiff’s personal account and the sale price was transferred to Plaintiff B’s general account for 20 years as of March 20, 2013.
The land concerned has already been members.