logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2021.03.02 2019구합71752
교원소청심사위원회결정취소
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff, including the part resulting from the participation.

Reasons

1. Details of the decision;

A. On March 1, 2010, the Plaintiff was appointed as an assistant professor at D University D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D’s appointment on March 1, 201, and

B. On March 21, 2018, the Intervenor received a civil petition against the Plaintiff, and conducted an audit of the Plaintiff’s misconduct from D University Auditor (hereinafter “Audit Board”) from D University Auditor to July 2018 (hereinafter “Audit Board”).

(c)

D. According to the results of the instant audit and inspection, the president of the D University requested the Plaintiff to adopt a resolution of heavy disciplinary action against the Plaintiff on October 8, 2018. On November 16, 2018, the D University Teachers Disciplinary Committee made a false claim for research expenses and jointly managed personnel expenses of the Institute. ② Private use of the national expenses; ③ false provision of BIS Monoring and Boxs in terms of medical treatment and surgery materials; ④ Violation of treatment and surgery materials; ④ Violation of instructions for medical treatment and private use; ⑤ Violation of instructions for medical treatment by using the previous ID; ⑤ Violation of the former 6th anniversary of treatment and medicine; 7th verbal abuse and assault against the previous public doctor; 9th sexual harassment and personal attack; 9th sexual harassment against women’s major; 9th sexual harassment and personal attack; 10th sexual harassment against the previous school juristic person’s major; 2nd sexual harassment and disciplinary action against his/her employee free of charge; 3rd foreign school juristic person’s non-performance; 3rd.

arrow