The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, it is true that, between February 1, 2015, 16:00 and 17:00, misunderstanding C prices the lower part of the Defendant’s right threshold by driving at “Esing” located in Chungcheong-gun D, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and thereby inflicted an injury on the Defendant’s upper part.

Even though C did not have inflicted an injury upon the Defendant by assaulting the Defendant, the Defendant was not aware of its falsity.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (two years of suspended execution of August, 200, observation of protection, and community service of 160 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. The summary of each of the facts charged of this case which the court below found guilty is as follows.

On January 6, 2016, the Defendant prepared a false statement of complaint about C in the public service center of the Young-dong branch office located in the 77-ro, Young-dong, Young-dong, Young-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Dong-dong, and submitted it to the employees of the civil service office by using the color pen.

The written complaint was the content that “A, the husband of the president, was punished, because C, who was the husband of the president, sustained the bodily injury in the Esing room located in Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong from February 1, 2015 to 17:00.”

After that, on January 19, 2016, the Defendant suffered from the injury that is damaged by putting the bottom of the right side of the Defendant into the right side in the course of putting off the door door from the instant singing room from February 1, 2015 to February 16 to 17:00, the investigation of the Chungcheong-dong Police Station and from the F Team office located in the Young-dong, Young-dong, Young-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Young-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, and the Defendant at the F Team office.

“A statement made” with the content that “.”

However, there was only the fact that C had been produced out of the singing room in the above time and place, and there was no injury caused by C at the time and place.