logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2017.09.14 2016고단150
무고
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 18, 2016, the Defendant submitted a written complaint with respect to C and D at the public service offices of the Young-dong branch offices of the public prosecutor's office of the public prosecutor's office of the Cheong-dong branch office of the public prosecutor's office of the Cheong-dong, Young-dong, Dong-dong

Around September 3, 2014, the complainant purchased the price of KRW 390 million from D, the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “instant sales contract”) who was the Defendant Nonparty C, a private broker, as the broker of the Defendant C, in the name of the Defendant Nonparty C, for free until the payment of the remaining amount, under the condition that he/she would engage in flat work free of charge until the payment of the purchase (hereinafter referred to as “the instant land”), and paid KRW 40 million to D as the down payment on the same day. The Defendant Nonparty failed to perform the said flat work, and sold the instant land to H around July 20, 2015, thereby obtaining the said down payment amount of KRW 40 million.

‘The content' was ‘the content.

After that, on February 2, 2016, the Defendant sold the instant land in KRW 390 million on September 3, 2014, at the police station investigation and intelligence team office located in Young-dong, Young-dong, Young-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and Young-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and the owner of forests and land as a condition of a special agreement is to complete flat work until December 31, 2014.

Until the date on which the special agreement was entered, Defendant Nonparty Nonparty did not pay the balance because he did not comply with the promise.

The commitment to the special agreement was led by C, but D also desires to do so on the side.

The consent was given.

In the absence of the condition that the Defendant and the Defendant did not enter into a contract with the permission for development activities on the instant land and would not pay the down payment.

“The statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, at the time of the instant sales contract, C and D did not have agreed with the Defendant on the terms of a special agreement to engage in flat work on the instant land free of charge.

As a result, the defendant has a false fact to the investigation agency for the purpose of having C and D punished criminal punishment.

arrow