logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.12.18 2014고단2467
절도미수
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 6. 17. 08:30경 서울 성북구 동소문로 102 지하철 4호선 길음역과 성신여대입구역 사이를 운행중인 지하철 전동차 안에서 피해자 C가 메고 있던 가방(아식스 벨백)의 지퍼를 열고 안에 들어 있는 지갑 등을 꺼내어 가는 방법으로 피해자 소유의 재물을 절취하려 하였으나, 피고인이 지퍼를 여는 것을 눈치 챈 피해자가 이를 발견하고 제지함으로써 미수에 그쳤다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. An interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution (including the substitute part of C);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Attachment of a photograph of the victim);

1. Relevant Article 342 of the Criminal Act and Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel in determining the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the provisional payment order are to deny the crime by: (a) the Defendant and the defense counsel took the knife the knife of the knife and knife the knife of the knife;

However, even though the victim C has been consistent from the investigative agency to the court, it has made a concrete statement about the circumstances before and after the crime, and it has been distorted.

Considering the fact that it is difficult to see that the defendant was designated as an offender due to either mistake or misunderstanding, and that the victim C does not have any reason to dismiss the defendant, the above argument cannot be accepted.

Although there are criminal records of the same kind of sentencing reasons, the sentence shall be determined like the disposition, considering the fact that the victim sent the letter that the wife wants after the closure of pleadings, that there is no result of damage by attempted crime, that currently is being employed and live faithfully in good faith, and that the children should care alone.

arrow