The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defamation (1) The Defendant, on August 23, 2015, posted at the E company office located on D2 floor D with the victim C around 10:00 on August 23, 2015, notwithstanding the fact that the victim and F did not have any relationship with the victim and F, the Defendant, despite that G and H did not have any relationship with F, “C, F, Chewing gue, F, F, F, and F, F, F, F, F, and F, at the place of a hearing by G and H.

The phrase "Seman ..." damages the reputation of the victim by publicly alleging false facts, and (2) the defendant, at around 11:00 on August 25, 2015, at the J agency located I of the Republic of Korea, on August 25, 2015, the fact that the victim and F was not related to the victim and F, despite the absence of the fact that the victim and the Ne are in the state of "Seman C and Miscellaneous F," and the defendant, at the same time when K and Dong Ne are heard, should pay liquor tax.

“The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly expressing false facts.”

B. On September 1, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Protection, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization (hereinafter “Defendant”), using his mobile phone from the Defendant’s home located in L/ 303 or L/ 303 on September 22/20, 2015, thereby putting his/her husband in the events of Gangwon-do with his/her mother-do away from his/her mother, leading the Defendant to his/her away with his/her mother, and making the Defendant know of his/her opening.

Abreging abreging and having the same year of winding so that they can get married.

The Kakao Stockholm message was sent to the victim’s cell phone at least four times in total from that time to that of the victim’s cell phone by sending the victim’s cell phone in the following manner: (a) the Kakao Stockholm message was sent to the victim’s cell phone from that time to that of the victim’s cell phone from that time to that time; and (b) the victim’s cell phone was sent to the victim’s cell phone by the aforementioned method as indicated in the list of crimes committed in the attached Table.

By doing so, the Defendant repeatedly makes language that arouses fear and apprehension through information and communications networks.