A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case [2015 did not fall short of 606] List of Offenses 2013.

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] On April 16, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, three years of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 24, 2013 (hereinafter “previous conviction”), and on December 18, 2014, the Daejeon District Court sentenced ten months of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act and dismissed on March 12, 2015, and became final and conclusive on the same day.

(hereinafter referred to as “second preceding offense”).

1. On July 201, 201, the Defendant forged a private document, using the D’s resident registration certificate, seal imprint certificate, and seal imprint certificate, which was issued by the Defendant, who was a woman living together with the Defendant, to lease and use a motor vehicle in the name of D, by using the D’s resident registration certificate, seal imprint certificate, and seal imprint certificate.

On August 16, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around August 16, 2012, the Defendant: (b) had Hyundai Capital G Branch H H in the application for Hyundai Capital Car Lease using a clock pen in the application form for Hyundai Capital Car Lease using a clock pen in the space of customer information “D, I, Gyeongnam-si, Gyeongnam-si, Gyeongnam-dong, Inc., Ltd., Ltd., E employees, Co., Ltd.

J. 12 East 802, in the column for settlement information, “Agricultural K, Account Holder D,” and “BMW 740Li, Vehicle Number L,” and “D” were written in the column for vehicle information and stamped D’s personal seal impression affixed to D’s name.

For the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a motor vehicle lease application form in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant had the F, at the time, at the time, and place specified in Paragraph 1, use the forged motor vehicle lease application as stated in Paragraph 1 to the said H, who was aware of the forgery.

[2015 Highest 606]

3. The fraud defendant is a substantial operator of E, a stock company, who has been engaged in an auction business that re-sales a factory after obtaining a contract for the factory, etc., and is engaged in the auction business during July 201, with the victim M and the victim N.