beta
Text
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 634,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from February 25, 2017 to the day of full payment.
Reasons
Basic Facts
On April 12, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with D, which operated a warehouse business under the name of “C”, and from April 12, 2014 to April 12, 2016, to entrust the storage of equipment related to biogas plant (hereinafter “instant equipment”) as follows, owned by the Plaintiff, and attached a condition that the instant goods should be handled safely with the person in charge of the Plaintiff’s company when moving the instant goods to a storage place because they are important facilities for biogas. At that time, D paid KRW 10,00,000 for storage fees.
The name name size size No. 1 Confit 40fit 42. 60 cubic meters/h 14 schooling tank 170,000ccal 15 heating equipment 200,000ccal 16 old lease recovery equipment 3 cubic meters/h 200 8 high voltage pumps 300 8 high voltage pumps washing 300 88 high voltage pumps 300bar 199,00bar 199, the Defendant moved part of the goods of this case to another warehouse in the Kimpo-si E warehouse (hereinafter referred to as “E warehouse”) located in the warehouse at D’s request.
Plaintiff
around March 2016, F of the Company’s Executive Director visited E warehouse to check the storage condition of the instant goods. During the above movement process, packing materials, etc. of the instant goods were removed, and they were damaged to the extent that they cannot be used for the container container and concentrate increase, and the high voltage pumps washing and dust concentration increase system was lost.
The plaintiff transferred the goods of this case without the plaintiff's permission and demanded the defendant to compensate for damages. On October 22, 2016, the defendant paid storage fees for the goods of this case to the plaintiff for a long period of neglect, and notified the plaintiff that he will dispose of the goods of this case in a voluntary manner unless the goods of this case are recovered.
I would not recover the instant goods even after the time limit set by the Defendant.