1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. Status 1 of the parties concerned; Defendant Intervenor’s Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”)

A) A local government that employs approximately 1,680 full-time workers. On September 14, 2010, the Plaintiff is the Federation of Korean Workers’ Unions. On December 20, 2013, the Plaintiff established a branch of the Gunsan branch of the Gunsan branch of the Plaintiff’s Gunsan branch of the 41 worker belonging to the Intervenor (10 simple labor workers and 31 road repair workers). Meanwhile, in the Gunsan branch of the Plaintiff’s Gunsan branch of the Gunsan branch of the Gunsan branch of the Plaintiff, there is a labor union that overlaps with the Plaintiff’s organization (hereinafter referred to as “non-party military labor union”). This is not a superior organization as a company-level labor union established under the organization of indefinite contract workers belonging to the Intervenor, and there is no superior organization as a company-level labor union established under the organization of indefinite contract workers belonging to the Intervenor.

In addition, in the Gunsan-si, there is a branch of common service in the Gunsan-si, established on December 26, 2012, a superior organization is the Federation of Korean Workers' Unions, and 41 members of the plaintiff are members of the Korean Regional Joint and Several Workers' Unions.

B. On February 11, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application to divide the Intervenor’s indefinite contract workers into simple labor workers, street cleaners, and road repair personnel, respectively, or filed an application to divide the types of road repair personnel into a separate negotiating unit and divide only the types of road repair personnel into a separate negotiating unit.

On March 27, 2015, the Jeonbuk Regional Labor Relations Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s application for decision on the separation of bargaining units.

C. On April 15, 2015, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the review decision by the National Labor Relations Commission, seeking revocation of the dismissal decision by the former North Regional Labor Relations Commission.