logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.11.12 2015고정1755
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 24, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Busan District Court for the crime of conflict, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 31, 2015.

around 22:00 on July 31, 2014, the Defendant stated that “Around July 22, 2015, the Defendant would lend cash to the victim before the home of the victim D, who was located in the Busan-gu Busan-gu C building 202, that “I will return the card password to the Plaintiff within the Republic of Korea, if there is a difference in cash due to an error in the number of the card password.”

However, the defendant was not a resident of 303, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay it.

The Defendant received 50,000 won from the victim, namely, the money borrowed from the seat.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

"2015, 3031"

1. On August 25, 2014, the Defendant issued 20,000 won in cash to the victim G who is an employee at the Fmat located in Busan, Busan, Busan, on a false basis, on August 25, 2014.

2. Around 03:00 on August 25, 2014, the Defendant received 20,000 won in cash from the victim at the places specified in paragraph (1) in the same manner as that specified in paragraph (1).

3. On August 25, 2014, at around 05:00 on August 25, 2014, the Defendant issued 40,000 won in cash from the victim a false statement that “the Defendant would have come to her natives who live in a local area and would have borrowed KRW 40,000,000 to receive 80,000 from her natives.”

However, even if the defendant borrows money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

As a result, the defendant deceivings the victim and received 80,000 won in cash three times in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Statement of each police statement related to D and G;

1. A previous conviction in judgment:

arrow