logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.04.16 2014고정4983
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 22:00 on May 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) carried 2950,000 won in cash owned by the victim D, which was kept under custody of the victim D, located in Busan Jin-gu C, Busan, and stolen it.

"2015, 506"

1. On April 17, 2014, the victim E recommended the purchase of real estate at G Hospital located in Busan, Busan, Busan, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, “B, as a person of distinguished service to the State who has rendered distinguished service to the Marine Corps, shall have five million won monthly pension, and close one of two vehicle parts companies operated in China, and immediately enter the Republic of Korea, 6.4 billion won, and upon deposit of the pension, the Defendant shall enter into the real estate contract, and upon deposit of the pension, the Defendant shall lend the money for the full payment.”

However, the fact that the defendant was not a person of distinguished service to the State or was not a person of distinguished service to the State, did not receive pension, did not operate or enter the company in China, and did not receive any money, and did not receive any money from the victim, even if he borrowed money from the victim without any property or any certain income.

As such, the Defendant deceiving the victim and received 550,000 won from the victim, namely, the money borrowed from the seat.

2. On May 7, 2014, the victim H made a false statement to the victim H, who was engaged in a stowingdo in Busan-dong, Busan-dong, stating that “B, as a person of distinguished service to the State who has rendered distinguished service to the Marine Corps, would return the monthly pension of 6 million won and there is no drinking value in operating two automobile parts companies in China, with interest rate of 20% if it is lent money.”

However, the facts were that the defendant was not a person of distinguished service to the State or was not a person of distinguished service to the State, not a pension, and that there was no company operated in China, and that he was living as a subsidy from the State without any property or a certain income.

arrow