(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.02.07 2016가단115708

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.02.07 2016가단115708

임대차보증금

Text

1. The Defendant: KRW 31,448,059 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from June 12, 2016 to February 7, 2018.

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. On June 2006, the Plaintiff: (a) around 500 square meters in the first floor and around 500 square meters in surrounding land among the land buildings C in Nam-si, Namyang-si; (b) from the Defendant around June 2006, the Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s real estate.

) A deposit shall be paid KRW 20 million, and monthly rent (the first monthly rent shall not be known, and as seen below, after being renewed, the following changes are made at once, and the last renewed lease agreement shall be KRW 2.5 million, which is stipulated in the renewed lease agreement from June 12, 2015 to June 11, 2016.

(1) The term “instant lease agreement” (hereinafter referred to as “instant lease agreement”) is determined to be paid.

(2) At the time, the Plaintiff had been operating the instant real estate at the time. However, the Defendant stated to the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff “on the basis of the presentation of the consideration, the Plaintiff would grant KRW 20 million to the Plaintiff, and upon the payment of the said consideration, the Plaintiff paid KRW 20 million to the Plaintiff, and around that time, the Plaintiff paid KRW 20 million to the Defendant. The instant lease contract was renewed on several occasions, and the lease contract was renewed on June 12, 2010 (A-3), and the amount of KRW 20 million should be paid at the time of the expiration of the future contract. (excluding the difference between the lessor and the reimbursement of KRW 20 million if the lessee was paid for the redevelopment, etc., but the lessor did not have the authority to implement the said development project on the land that was prepared for the first time in 201-D without the lessor’s right to implement the development project on the land that was formulated for the first time in 201.

If a lessee fails to pay rent more than twice, he/she shall waive the Si facility and cancel the contract.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2017.01.17 2016가단6726

-광주지방법원해남지원 2019.04.23 2017가단2615

-부산지방법원 2015.02.12 2014가합40407

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.21 2017가단5128001

-서울서부지방법원 2020.05.13 2019가단15802