logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.10.04 2016나2079794
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance, including the claims added at the trial, shall be modified as follows:

Defendant.

Reasons

1. The reasons why this Court shall state on this case are as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the following Paragraph 2, and are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Part I or added “Defendant Hyundai Industrial Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Hyundai Industries Development Co., Ltd.”)” in Section 4, Section 15 of the judgment of the first instance court, which is divided into “a trial work and a trial work” in Section 17 of the same part into “Defendant Hyundai Industries Development Co., Ltd.,” and “the Defendant Hyundai Industries Development Co., Ltd., Ltd., a newly incorporated corporation on May 2, 2018” (hereinafter “Defendant Hyundai Industries Development, regardless of whether before the division”).

Attached Form 1, 2, and 3 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be replaced by attached Form 1-1, 2, 2-1, 2, 2, 3-1, and 2 attached to this judgment, respectively.

Part 6 of the judgment of the first instance court, "84,831,345 won" in Part 6 of the judgment of the second instance shall be used as "926,438,713 won", and the second part of the judgment of the second part shall be as follows.

After the inspection for use was conducted for the second year of the second year of the previous 2 year of the previous 3 year of the previous 4 year of the previous 5 year of the previous 10th year of the previous 4th 5 year of the previous 10th 175,175,678,160 10,148,1946 192,984,79,587 231,227,430, 760, 2260, 2262, 784, 02214, 835, 735, 675, 468, 46175, 7641, 768, 1978, 1984, 1968, 257, 1968, 205, 267, 3685, 207, 1968, 2084

1) The Plaintiff’s 379.5 household units among the sectional owners of the instant apartment 409 household units (hereinafter “transfer household of the instant case”).

From the sectional owners of the above sectional ownership, the above sectional owner's damage claim in lieu of the defect repair against the buyer or the contractor of the apartment in this case is transferred, and the assignment is made.

arrow