1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the judgment against the Defendants exceeding the money ordered to be paid below is revoked.

1. The reasons why this Court shall state on this case are as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the following Paragraph 2, and are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. It shall replace “attached Form 1” and “attached Form 2” attached to the judgment of the first instance court with “attached Form 1” and “attached Form 2” attached to this judgment.

Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance court is as follows.

Article 14 of the former 5th 5th 5th 5th 2 year of the previous 14th 2 year of the previous 15th 2 year of the previous 14th 5th 2 year of the previous 10th 5th 3 year of the previous 10th 45th 2, "The additional 461,760,9411,275,52,520,9211,401, 404, 402, 803, 4543, 861, 861, 861, 741, 941, 275th 1,275, 364, 231, 544, 2168, 892, 3200, 3208, 4461, 286, 397, 36486, 1967, 397

Of the sixth table of the judgment of the court of first instance, the judgment of the part "(public 29) of the wall non-finites of each of the same stairs room "non-finites non-construction" shall be made as follows.

The criteria for the preparation of housing design documents are subject to the order of “general specifications, standard specifications, etc.” in a case where the interpretation of a construction contract is difficult. However, the standard specifications are governed by the standard specifications without any special instruction, such as materials and other special specifications, and the standard specifications are required to be carried out in the form of a pattern crop process schedule by stating “regular, acrylic transparent,” and the standard specifications are required to be carried out the normal construction. As such, the part of the judgment of “public 190” in the 6th sentence of the first instance judgment recognizing the difference in the construction cost for the upper part is determined.