A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

around September 2017, the Defendant stated that “The convenience store that works in the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment is being operated along with the mother, and there is also a convenience store that is directly operated in E at the time of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment to the extent that the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment was made and G apartment was sold in lots.”

However, in fact, the defendant only worked as an employee of the convenience store and did not own the convenience store operated by him, and did not have any intention or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed money from the victim due to no particular income.

Around September 21, 2017, the Defendant received a total of KRW 2 million from the victim to the H deposit account in the name of the Defendant and received a total of KRW 4,1560,000 from around that time to March 7, 2019, as shown in the list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

On March 26, 2019, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would pay 1.5 million won for the operation of convenience points and to pay 1.5 million won for the loan of 1.5 million won.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was merely an employee of convenience stores and did not operate convenience stores, and was thought to use the borrowed money as an individual rehabilitation debt repayment rather than the price for goods borrowed, and the personal rehabilitation debt was not less than 30 million won and the monthly amount was not less than 30 million won, and there was no intention or ability to pay the amount borrowed from the victim on a timely basis because there was a lack of funds to repay the individual rehabilitation debt that should have been paid each month.

As above, the Defendant deceivings the victim, and thereby deceiving him from the victim, L. 26 March 2019.