logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.07.09 2014고단445
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 7, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, who is an owner of the business at the “D” 1st floor of the Changpo-si, Changpo-si, Changpo-si, Changpo-si, 2014, stating that the Defendant “on the face of the amount of eight million won in advance, from the 9th day of this month to the employee.”

However, from the beginning, the Defendant did not intend to work as an employee at the above singing shop.

On June 8, 2009, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 7.8 million won from the victim, via the Busan Bank Account (Account Number G) in the name of F on the advance payment.

On June 17, 2010, the Defendant: “A: a debtor: a joint and several surety: K prepares a loan certificate in the name of “K” in the name of “A: a debtor, a joint and several surety.”

However, even if a person receives a prepaid payment, he/she did not intend to work as an employee at all.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, acquired 8,000,000 won (A shares: 2,000,000 won: 6 million won) from the victim’s account from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (M) account in the name of the Defendant.

Around 15:00 on June 29, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim P, “The Defendant is an employee of the Rnobya Bank located in Q Q in Mapo-si, while he/she is working for the employee of the Rnobya Bank in Q Q, he/she will pay money at other places in order to repay prepaid money.”

However, in fact, the Defendant, at the time, was living in the name of “refluence” in which he was unable to repay the prepaid money received from several entertainment taverns, and thus, was aware that the Defendant was unable to pay the said money normally even if he borrowed the money from the victim.

In conclusion, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby, KRW 5 million from the victim.

arrow