logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.08.22 2012고단6477
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2012 Highest 6477"

1. On March 6, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement that the Defendant would sublet the instant officetels leased to the victim C to four million won (4 million won).

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to sublet the instant officetel to the victim C, on the ground that: (a) on February 2012, 2012, the Defendant leased the instant officetel at KRW 500,000,000,000 for a monthly rent of KRW 3.90,000,000,

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received one million won as a sublease deposit from the victim, and three million won as the same name around the seventh day of the same month, respectively, from the victim, to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant.

2. On April 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) immediately needed money to the victim C; (b) provided that, if lending KRW 50,000,000, the Defendant would make payment after one week.

However, there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money, even if the money was borrowed from the victim for the same reasons as the preceding paragraph.

As such, the Defendant deceiving the victim and received 50,000 won from the victim, namely, from the victim, to the agricultural bank account under the name of the Defendant, as a loan, and around the 30th day of the same month, 350,000 won and 350,000 won

5.4. Around April, one million won, including 600,000 won, was remitted from the above victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the defendant.

3. On April 1, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to sublet the studio leased by the Defendant to the victim E at KRW 8.5 million.

However, in fact, the Defendant leased the above studio on March 2012 to 5 million won as a security deposit, but did not have any money paid as a security deposit, so there was no intention or ability to sublet the above studio to the victim.

The defendant.

arrow