(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.05.01 2013고단506

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.05.01 2013고단506

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The defendant pays 1,722,800 won to D who is an applicant for compensation.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 26, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Incheon District Court for fraud, etc., and was released on April 30, 2012 by the Incheon Detention Center, and the parole period expired on May 21, 2012.

around July 2012, the Defendant: (a) did not have any special property or income; (b) on the other hand, the bond amounting to KRW 1,000,000 or KRW 9,500,000; (c) did not have the ability to repay the bond; (d) around that time, the Defendant lent money from the victim C who was under the teaching system to repay the bond and used it as living expenses, etc.

1. On July 11, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, stating that “A mobile phone fee of 500,000 won is borrowed. If not, a Handphone is cut down.”

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay the money with the victim's money to replace the handphone with the victim's money.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 500,000 won from the victim under the pretext of the Handphone fee immediately.

2. Around July 13, 2012, the Defendant called the victim at the place indicated in paragraph 1 and made a false statement to the effect that “the studio would be scam for the same studio.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to live together with the victim in the old room.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 3,000,000 won under the name of the studio deposit immediately from the victim.

3. On July 16, 2012, the Defendant called the victim at the place specified in paragraph 1 and made a false statement to the effect that “A household was required to have studio. The same shall apply to the preparation of a household, which is KRW 3 million.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to live a household by seeking studio.

The defendant was immediately transferred 3,00,000 won as the price for household immediately from the victim.

4. The Defendant on July 2012

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.10.30 2013고단2195

-광주지방법원 2017.10.20 2017고단3179

-춘천지방법원 속초지원 2014.12.24 2014고단101

-인천지방법원 2013.02.15 2012고정1703

-인천지방법원 2013.09.06 2013노740