logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.01.06 2014고단2968
사기
Text

Defendant

B Imprisonment for one year, Defendant A and C shall be punished by imprisonment for each of eight months.

However, Defendant A and C are subject to objection.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On August 6, 2009, in order to be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, for a period of one year and two months, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on April 29, 2010.

1. Defendant A and C (Fraud against Victim F) on February 25, 2008, the Defendants borrowed money from the victim F’s house located in Pakistan on February 25, 2008, to receive loans from the victim as security and to repay the money one month after receiving loans from the victim’s room.

“A false representation was made.”

However, at the time of fact, the Defendants did not have any particular property, and Defendant C did not have any intention or ability to purchase studio, even if she borrowed money from the injured party, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money borrowed from the injured party.

On February 26, 2008, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim, and acquired 50 million won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Deposit Account in the name of the Defendant C on the pretext of borrowing money from the victim.

2. Defendant A and B

A. On February 14, 2012, the Defendants’ fraud against the victim H may recover from the “J” of the said Defendant’s operation of the said Defendant “J” that is located in the name of the mother under the family-based title to the same child B, and may recover from the victim H the miscarriage that he/she has to pay taxes. If he/she lends money, he/she would pay taxes and reimburse the legacy.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, Defendant B was not a partner of Defendant A, and Defendant B did not have any inheritance, and Defendant A did not have any intent or ability to complete payment even if he borrowed money from the injured party due to the absence of any particular property.

On February 14, 2012, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim as such and received 1.5 million won from the victim to the agricultural bank account in the name of Defendant B’s husband K on February 14, 2012, as well as the transfer of 1.5 million won to the agricultural bank account in the name of Defendant B on February 22, 2012. The Defendants were all from the above day to February 22, 2012.

arrow