beta
Text
Defendant
A, with respect to the crime No. 1 in the judgment of the court of first instance, he shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for 2 years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2014Gohap88] Defendant B is a person who wishes to be a candidate for the former Superintendent of the Provincial Office of Education at the 6th nationwide local election held on June 4, 2014. Defendant A is a person in charge of planning an election campaign conducted by Defendant B. Defendant C is a person entrusted by Defendant B, Defendant C is a person in charge of managing funds related to the election, and Defendant D is a person in charge of accounting affairs of the Foundation established for an election campaign by providing a place, such as an office, etc. for conducting an election campaign conducted by Defendant B.
Except for the cases of offering allowances, actual expenses, and other benefits under the Public Official Election Act, no one shall offer or express an intention to offer money, goods, or other benefits in connection with the election campaign, or promise, instruct, induce, mediate, demand or receive any promise to offer such money, goods, or other benefits.
1. Defendants’ violation of the Public Official Election Act
A. On August 26, 2013, Defendant B and Defendant B provided Defendant B with KRW 10 million (50,000 KRW 20,000 KRW 50,00) in cash in terms of election activity expenses, etc. to have Defendant B elected from the 6-time nationwide local election to the former superintendent of education, at the house of Defendant B, Dongpo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, 101 Dongpo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si. Defendant A received this.
B. Around October 6, 2013, Defendant B, and C conspired with Defendant B, C, and C provided Defendant D with a place, such as an office, to conduct an election campaign, and 1,350,000 won in cash for the purpose of election campaign at the office established by Defendant D for the election campaign of Defendant B. Defendant B, and C received the same. Defendant B, and C conspired with Defendant B around November 6, 2013, and transferred KRW 2,750,00 to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of Defendant D’s wife M under the above circumstances.