Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) of the original judgment (one year and nine months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is reasonable to take into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s mistake against himself/herself; and (b) the Defendant appears to have the possibility of edification and improvement at the young age of the 20th early group.

However, since the total amount of damage from each of the crimes of this case exceeds KRW 60 million, the liability for the crime of this case is significant; the defendant has repeatedly withdrawn deposit with the NAC Debit Card of this case; the crime of this case is not good; the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the repeated crime period of the victim D by threatening the victim D; the defendant did not agree with the victims; the defendant did not agree with the victims; the defendant did not recover damage; and all of the sentencing conditions such as defendant's age, character and character, environment, motive, means and consequence after the crime; the circumstances after the crime were committed; the sentencing range of recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission; the 4th category of larceny for general property; the victim's repeated crime area; the recommendation area; the recommendation area (the recommendation area); the recommendation area; the recommendation area; the majority of 1 to 20 years of imprisonment with prison labor; the recommendation range (the recommendation range of 1 to 20 years; the recommendation range of general property; the recommendation range of 1 to 1 to 6 years or more).

3. As the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, and pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure, “Article 319 of the Criminal Act” in the fourth fiveth sentence of the judgment of the lower court is “Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act,” and “at night entry” in the sixth sentence.