beta
Text
Defendant
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) of the original judgment (two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
Judgment
It is reasonable to take into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to the instant crime and reflects his mistake in depth; (b) the amount of damage is relatively small; and (c) all the damaged items were returned to the victims; (d) the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime somewhat dynamicly; and (e) the mental and physical health state appears to be insufficient.
However, the crime of this case is an unfavorable circumstance to the defendant, such as that the defendant committed theft of clothes, etc. by putting the goods in a separate room and continuously taking the place in the way that the defendant would bring about a loss of surveillance by pretending to customers in the shopping center. It is not good that the crime of this case was committed, that the defendant did not agree with the victims, and that there was a history of having been sentenced to multiple punishment for the same kind of crime.
In this context, from June to September 1, 200, the scope of the recommendation and sentence with respect to the instant crime according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court: the thie crime group, the thie crime group, the 2th category of larceny (general larceny), the special salvists (general larceny), the decision-making scope of the recommendation field (basic area), the sentencing range ( June to June), the 2nd category of larceny for general property: the thie crime group, the thief group, the thief group, the special salvance (general larceny), the decision-making scope of the recommendation field (basic area), the 3th category of larceny for general property: the thief group, the 2nd category of larceny for general property, the decision-making of the recommendation field (basic area), the recommendation range (basic area), the recommendation range), the stief group, the stief group, the circumstances of the instant crime, the circumstances of the lower court, etc. are too inappropriate.
The defendant's appeal is without merit.