Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) of the original judgment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

Considering the fact that the Defendant led to the instant crime and reflects his mistake in depth, that the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime to maintain his livelihood, and that the amount of damage is relatively small.

However, there are circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's repayment of damage caused by the crime of this case or failure to agree with the victims, the defendant has been punished several times for the same crime, and in particular, the defendant committed the crime of this case during the suspension of execution due to the same crime.

In this context, from August to February 1, 200 to February 1, 200, the scope of the recommendation and sentence with respect to the instant crime according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court: thth th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.