logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.05.24 2018구합2006
견책처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a police officer who was appointed as a policeman on November 5, 1992 and served as a performance officer from January 30, 2015 to the National Police Agency Security and Foreign History.

B. In accordance with the request for disciplinary action against the Plaintiff, the Defendant, as a police official, shall observe all relevant laws and regulations and serve in good faith and in good faith, and in particular, he shall not do any act detrimental to his dignity regardless of whether it is on or off duty.

A. On January 13, 2017, around 17:54, the victim police officer C (33 years of age, women) called “her husband with the knowledge of the fact that he/she was living separately from his/her husband,” and called “her husband with the knowledge of the fact that he/she was living separately from his/her husband,” and called “her husband, even if he/she drinked to his/her husband at his/her home,” and “bather bating to the end of his/her weekend, she requested an inappropriate meter,” and called “bather batch.”

(hereinafter referred to as “the First Corruption”). (b)

On January 20, 2017, around 23:18, while under the influence of alcohol at night, the victim was blicked by a sclick-ro sclicked horse c " which was inappropriate."

(hereinafter referred to as "the second act"). (c)

At around 17:35 on January 31, 2017, the Plaintiff sent to the effect that the same victim would use the police online Messenger, and that the Plaintiff would want to remain in the external Messenger, and that “I want to remain in the external Messenger,” and that there was a ssenger, such as demanding to send a page to the Plaintiff that “I want to get in the external Messenger.”

(hereinafter referred to as “third-party act”). D.

On February 7, 2017, the victim called the victim on the phone on February 7, 2017, and sexual harassment such as creating a sense of sexual humiliation by speaking as "I am l't h't h', I am h't h'd', and I am h't h't h't.

(hereinafter referred to as "grounds for disciplinary action"). (e)

On January 2017, the victim called the same victim and called the "F is well-grounded in selecting the E-Policy Excellent Police Station at the home office, and D is only to width.

arrow