Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

1.(a)

On January 21, 2010, at around 11:00, the victim D, operated by Kimpo-si Kimpo-si, damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “D did not go to all female students and have been divingd” to the victim F, G, H, etc.

B. On January 25, 2010, around 10:00, the victim’s reputation by publicly pointing out false facts by stating that “D was attached to I in the chemical room before several days” to the trainees F, G, and H at the above location, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts;

2. From December 2009 to January 201, 2010, the victim’s 10% of the forest owned by the victim, which is equivalent to 24 million won at the victim’s market price, was stolen at the aforementioned place as indicated in the list of crimes committed in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Part of the second protocol of the trial concerning witness D, F, I, and G;

1. Part of the police against the defendant, and the protocol of interrogation of the suspect (including replacement part of the defendant);

1. Statement of the police statement to F and I;

1. A written statement F, I, and G;

1. Report on investigation (any picture and photograph of the suspect);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the theft forest;

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) and Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Summary of the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion

A. 1-1 of the facts constituting defamation

As to paragraph, the defendant stated that he was such a speech, but I responded to the question whether I would be aware that "I would be a woman member in the loss, and I would not be a sick person," and I would like to answer the question whether I would be a member in the presence of two members in the loss.