beta
Text
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid 18 million won to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its objection from February 1, 2010 to November 12, 2013.
Reasons
【Judgment on Claims for Merits】
1. Basic facts
A. At around 11:00 on January 21, 2010, the Defendant stated in D, operated by the Plaintiff in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, that “A student E, F, G, etc. did not go to the sick that the Plaintiff did not go to the sick that all female students were taking a locked,” and on January 25, 2010, the Defendant stated that “A student E, F, and G was attached to H at the same place on the same date at around 10:00 on January 25, 2010 (hereinafter “each of the instant defamation”).
B. From December 2009 to January 201, 2010, the Defendant stolen (hereinafter “instant theft”) 10 points of the forest owned by the Plaintiff at the same place (hereinafter “instant forest”).
C. The defendant
(a) and (b)
In regard to each of the facts stated in paragraph (1), a summary indictment was filed (this Court approximately 2010 High Court Decision 1443), and a request for formal trial was filed, and the court of first instance (this court 201 High Court 201 High Court 201 High Court 44) was sentenced to a fine of two million won on November 9, 201, and the appeal was filed by the court of second instance (In Incheon District Court 201No3918) on June 22, 2012. The second appeal was dismissed on June 22, 2012. The second appeal was dismissed on July 25, 2013 by the court of third instance (Supreme Court 2012Do8126).
[Reasons for Recognition]
2. According to the above acknowledged facts, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant theft and defamation, barring any special circumstance.
3. Scope of liability for damages
A. In a lawsuit seeking compensation for damages due to an illegal act as to the part of the theft of this case, where it is difficult to prove specific amount of damages due to the nature of the case, the court revealed the result of examination of evidence and the purport of the entire pleadings.