1. The plaintiff's primary claim and the conjunctive claim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. (i) On March 30, 1987, the Plaintiff was appointed as a public official belonging to the NIS and retired on December 30, 2016 (Grade II).

On April 198, 198, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “damage to the slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives of slives and slives of slives of slives of slives.”

on March 2, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons of distinguished service to the State with the following content.

In case of an applicant injury: Around September 1989, the reasons why the injury was caused by the knee-knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kn-kn-ket

Referencely, on February 2, 2018, the Defendant issued the “each of the instant dispositions” to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to view the Plaintiff’s application as a public official that caused the occurrence or aggravation of proximate causal relation with the Plaintiff’s performance of duties or education and training.

【Unsatisfied Facts, Gap’s 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, Eul’s 1-1, Eul’s 4-1, 2, 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. (i) Whether each of the dispositions in this case is legitimate.