1. The plaintiff and the plaintiff succeeding intervenor's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff and the Plaintiff among the litigation costs.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) Defendant medical corporation B (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant medical corporation”);

) The E Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”)

(2) The Plaintiff is a patient who was in charge of the Plaintiff’s anesthesia’s anesthesia at the Defendant Hospital and was in charge of the Plaintiff’s anesthesia at the Defendant Hospital. (3) The Plaintiff was in charge of the Plaintiff’s anesthesia at the Defendant Hospital and was in charge of the surgery on the part of an anti-monthly dys of the Defendant Hospital.

B. (1) On September 24, 2012, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital upon the diagnosis that the Plaintiff had a bridged while driving the bridge at the Defendant Hospital. As a result of the RI examination, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital upon the diagnosis that the breath of the upper right booms and the upper right half. (2) On October 5, 2012, the Plaintiff received anesthesia from Defendant D from Defendant Hospital, and was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on the part of the bomb and the bombing part of the bomb (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

3) On October 8, 2012, the Plaintiff complained of a paraman’s card at the Defendant Hospital, and raised the Gu soil once. 4) On October 10, 2012, the Plaintiff complained of a pain and low fluority of both sides at the Defendant Hospital, and the doctor of the Defendant Hospital recommended the Plaintiff to conduct the MOI inspection after administering the fluorial control and suppression.

5) On October 11, 2012, the Plaintiff underwent the RoI test at the Defendant Hospital on the part of October 11, 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed of incomplete macy between the right side and the 4,5 left side side-hand side-propon heat and the two sides. 6) On October 12, 2012, the Plaintiff was discharged from the Defendant Hospital on February 7, 2013 (the Defendant C and D did not take part in vertebrate therapy) and received preservation and physical therapy, and was discharged from the Defendant Hospital on February 7, 2013.

C. The Plaintiff’s present situation is incomplete due to the change of the institution’s diversified spine, 2, 3 times, 4, 5 times, etc.