logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.08.16 2019고단2959
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From June 2018 to November 26, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) operated a commercial sex business establishment with four marina rooms, shower rooms, etc. in Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, as the trade name (hereinafter “E”), and had the F (F, female, 53 years of age), etc., who are female employees, who had been employed in advance, receive 80,00 won as the price for sexual traffic, against many unspecified male customers who reported Internet commercial sex acts and found there.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. No person who violates the Medical Service Act shall establish a massage place without obtaining a recognition of qualification as a inseminator;

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not obtain the recognition of Marine's qualification, and did not receive 30,000 won or 50,000 won for massage for many unspecified male customers who found the place at the same time and place as the preceding paragraph, and had F (F, female employees, 53 years old), who were female workers employed in advance, engage in massage business by having them take charge of or divide telegraphs such as the shoulder and blue of the above male customers by using his hand and blue.

As a result, the Defendant established a massage treatment facility without obtaining the recognition of the qualification of the massage operator.

3. A person violating the Immigration Control Act shall not employ a foreigner who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment in the Republic of Korea. However, the Defendant, from October 2018 to November 26, 2018, paid a certain amount of allowance to the above G, F, etc., who is a mother who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment in the above “D” business, and employed him as an employee of the above business establishment so that he/she may engage in sexual traffic and massage business as above.

Accordingly, the defendant has a status of sojourn that can work in Korea.

arrow