logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2012.11.08 2012고단1271
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2012 Highest 1271"

1. On March 20, 2012, from around 11:30 to 12:10 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) intending to drink on credit by a victim D in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul on March 20, 2012; (b) intending to drink on credit by the Defendant and the victim, and (c) see the victim’s horses, “Is the victim’s “Isnman L”, “Is the victim’s speech that Is she would drink, she would drink, she would she would drink, she would drink, she would drink, she will do so, she will do so, she will do so, she will do so, she will do so, she will do so, and she will do so with his/her hand.”

놨다 하는 등 약 40분간 소란을 피워 그곳에서 술을 마시던 손님들을 밖으로 나가게 하고 안으로 들어오려던 손님들이 들어오지 못하게 하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. On May 24, 2012, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act: (a) at the I restaurant operated by the Victim H (Inn, 68 years of age) in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul on May 24, 2012; (b) at F’s I restaurant operated by the Victim H (Inn, 68 years of age); (c) at F’s f with the subcontractor, the Defendant took a bath to “or badly” out of F; and (d) the Defendant stated that “the victim “the victim is a few ages of age, who is less than, and takes a bath to, the victim’s face”; (c) at the victim’s face on the part of the victim’s face, which is a dangerous object on the customer’s face, the victim took the face at one time, and the part of the victim’s face was taken once a week’s face.

As a result, the Defendant committed a non-alleys, internal part, and two sides of the victim, which require approximately three weeks of treatment.

"2012 Highest 1714"

1. On July 4, 201, at the “L” restaurant operated by the victim K in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul around 23:20 on July 4, 201, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties, the Defendant refused the Defendant to request the alcohol, and the Defendant’s defective “eropoch, Chos, andpine families.”

arrow