Text
1. Of the instant lawsuits, the part of the claim seeking to submit a written statement that the perjury is repented.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On November 2, 2013, around 11:00, the accident occurred (hereinafter “the accident in this case”) involving a collision of a G-learning vehicle driven by C, which was driven by E on the left-hand lane at the right-hand side of the vehicle at the south-dong Yyang-dong (hereinafter “high-standing vehicle”) on November 2, 201, while the vehicle at the right-hand side of the vehicle at the right-hand side of the same road (hereinafter “the vehicle at right-hand”). At the time, the field map is the same as the attached site map at the time.
B. At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff A and C, who was the Plaintiff’s wife, and the Plaintiff B (which was before the birth of H, became 12 months at the time of the instant accident) was on board on the breast-learning vehicle.
C. The Plaintiffs and C filed a lawsuit against the Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., which concluded an insurance contract with respect to low-priced vehicles, as Seoul Central District Court 2015Kadan23534 (hereinafter “instant lawsuit”). After being designated as an appraiser in the instant lawsuit, the Defendant assessed whether the Plaintiffs and C could suffer any injury on any part of the instant accident in light of the background of the instant accident, the shock form and degree of the vehicle at the time of the accident, and the transport engineering.
On August 21, 2015, the Defendant presumed the instant accident to be a relatively minor collision that occurred during the course of the bypassing both the low-speed vehicle and the front-standing vehicle. The effective collision speed is presumed to be not more than approximately 10km/h. In the case of a low-speed collision accident, it is presumed that the level of shock is generally high, and it is difficult to deliver the shock to the passenger’s human body, and to cause injury, such as thale, which appears in the form of the consent of the collision. In light of the premise that the driver of the front-standing vehicle is a normal physical condition, the Defendant’s needs for passengers due to the instant accident.