Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
In order to commit the crime of “phishing” in the name of a named name, the name-free boxes organized various stages, such as incentives, accounts, and cash card solicitation books, management books, and delivery books, and the persons who are subject to the inducement books assumes phone calls from the victim without permission and misrepresenting the victim with investigation agencies, financial institutions, etc., and if the victim’s deposit money in financial institutions is in danger of illegal withdrawal, and the victim issued the victim’s name-free boxes as if security measures are necessary, the management books attempted to commit the crime by ordering the delivery books to the victim and receiving the amount of damage from the victim.
On October 2015, the Defendant received money from the name influence (O) infinites who are responsible for the management of the withdrawal of the racing, and responded to the proposal to deliver the name infinites, which is the cause of the organization of Bosing, to the person infinites.
According to the above public offering, the name indissected person shall call the victim P's cell phone from 09:30 on October 28, 2015 to the victim P's cell phone, and "the Seoul District Public Prosecutor's Office is the public prosecutor of Seoul District Public Prosecutor's Office, and the victim's passbook is likely to withdraw the money in the passbook because the victim's passbook was delayed, so he/she shall withdraw all the money in the passbook and deliver it to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service to
“Along with the false statement, the victim made the victim withdraw a total of KRW 34 million, including KRW 10,000 at the point in the Gu Ri of our bank and KRW 24,00,000 from the point in the Gu Ri of our bank. On October 28, 2015, at the end of the R tea shop located in Q Q at Gui-si around 13:20 on October 28, 2015, the Defendant seems to be an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, and the Defendant provided the victim with the above KRW 34,00,000,000,000,000,000 to the non-name.
As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with the employees of phishing operations, was informed of the victim by deceiving the victim, and received KRW 34 million from the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's statement in court;