1. The Defendant’s KRW 4,464,050 to Plaintiff B, as well as the annual rate of KRW 5% from September 7, 2012 to September 4, 2014, and thereafter.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - Business name: C (hereinafter referred to as “instant business”): Business name - Public notice of business authorization: D/ Public notice of permanent residence on March 19, 201, and public notice E on February 28, 2012 - Business operator: Defendant

B. The ruling of expropriation on July 19, 2012 (hereinafter “the instant ruling of expropriation”) - Of F forest land 36,503 square meters (hereinafter “F land”) at the time of permanent residence, 2,143 square meters (hereinafter “G land”) of 21,282 square meters (hereinafter “F land”) at 36,503 square meters (hereinafter “G land”) at 2,143 square meters (hereinafter “G land”) at 3,339 square meters at 2,143 square meters (hereinafter “the date of expropriation”) - The date of expropriation: The F land 128,756,100 won: The compensation for losses - The fact that there is no dispute as to the fact that there is no evidence set forth in subparagraph 1, subparagraph 2-2, subparagraph 3-2, subparagraph 5-2, and subparagraph 5-2, subparagraph 8-3, and each evidence set forth in the oral argument at 2012.

2. The plaintiffs' assertion (1) although the land category of the instant expropriated is different from each other, since it is the essential behind the solar power plant operated by the plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Plaintiff A"), the purpose of the land is the same as that of the solar power plant, the reasonable compensation should be paid by applying the unit price of the compensation equivalent to G expropriated land.

② Since the Plaintiffs were unable to use the remaining land remaining after being expropriated from F land and G land (hereinafter “the remaining land of this case”) for its original purpose, the Defendant shall purchase the remaining land of this case pursuant to Article 74 of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects (hereinafter “Public Works Projects Act”).

③ Since Plaintiff A suffered considerable loss from the operation of solar power plants as a result of the implementation of the instant project, Plaintiff A shall compensate for such loss.

④ Since it is also necessary to install fences, etc. around them, the defendant must do so pursuant to Article 79(2) of the Public Works Act.