1. As to KRW 246,056,00 and KRW 45,528,00 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 246,00 from January 3, 2018, and KRW 200,528,00.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and announcement 1): Project name B (hereinafter “instant project”);

(2) Notice: C Public Notice of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on August 7, 2015, and 3 project implementers announced D (Revised Notice) by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on August 18, 2016: Defendant

B. Subject matter of expropriation by the Central Land Tribunal on November 9, 2017 (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”): The land subject to expropriation by the Central Land Tribunal on November 9, 2017 (hereinafter “the land subject to expropriation”): The land subject to expropriation by the Sinsan-dong-gu E-16 square meters (hereinafter “the land subject to expropriation”).

The implementation of the instant project is a land divided into the land of 1,645 square meters in the area of 1,645 square meters in the Dong-gu, Seoyang-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City

- - The area of three square meters per Dong-dong G (hereinafter referred to as “the area of the second expropriation”) in Gyeyang-si.

The implementation of the instant project is a land divided into 115 square meters and divided into the area of 115 square meters and above the H, Seoyang-gu, Busan-gu.

at least 1 and 2 "each land expropriated in this case" shall be referred to as "each land expropriated in this case"

- The date of commencement of expropriation: 2) The compensation for expropriation on January 2, 2018: 1,302,580,800 won for the land subject to expropriation: The appraisal of KRW 1,304,451,00 for each part of the land above KRW 176,789,00 for each part of the land above KRW 1,30,200 for the land subject to expropriation: The appraisal of KRW 1,304,451,00 for the land subject to expropriation: The appraisal of KRW 176,789,00 for each part of the land above: I, J (hereinafter “Adjudication”) 5 for the judgment on the expropriation or the claim for compensation for the remaining land, which remains due to the division or expropriation of the land under expropriation under Article 1.

(2) In the case of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the Republic of Korea”) and in the case of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the Republic of Korea”), the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the Republic of Korea”) shall be the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the Republic of Korea”) and the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the Republic of Korea”) shall be the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the Republic of Korea”).

The plaintiff's claim is rejected on the ground that it is possible to use the remaining land of this case for the previous purpose and that the loss of price decrease is not recognized as a result of the appraisal of the adjudication (the fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, A.