beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Details of ruling;
(a) Recognition and Public Notice of Project - Road Project Name: Road Project (C national road construction works, hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Public Notice of June 17, 201: D-Project Operator announced by the Busan Regional Land Management Office on June 17, 201: Defendant (the head of the Busan Regional Construction and Management Administration)
B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on expropriation on May 25, 2012 - Land subject to expropriation: ① 14 lots of land subject to expropriation and 18 lots of land, F, and above 18 lots of land, listed in the list of land attached to the land list attached to the land list attached to the land list attached to Dong-gun, the Plaintiff owned by the Plaintiff, and ② 5 lots of land subject to expropriation (the sum of the land subject to expropriation in Plaintiff A and B combined with each of the land subject to expropriation in the same list as the land located in the Plaintiff, Gyeong-gun-gun, the Plaintiff, and the land subject to expropriation: ① Compensation for losses (the sum of the land subject to expropriation in both Plaintiff A and B) - Plaintiff: 1,592,594,190 won of the land subject to expropriation in this case, including the 14 lots of land, 14 lots of land, 133,28,430 won of the Plaintiff, and the date of commencement of expropriation: 3
The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on August 23, 2013 - Details of the adjudication: The amount of compensation for losses increased upon the Plaintiffs’ complaint; ① The Plaintiff’s compensation for losses: 1,69,69,839,380 won, such as the 14 parcels of land covered by this case, and obstacles; ② the Plaintiff’s B: 13,883,490 won, including the 14 parcels of land covered by this case.
D. The Central Land Tribunal’s adjudication on expropriation by April 17, 2014 - Contents of adjudication: The Central Land Tribunal shall dismiss a claim for expropriation against the remaining land Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5 (hereinafter “the remaining land No. 1”), the remaining land No. 6 through 11 (hereinafter “the remaining land No. 3”), and the remaining land No. 22 through 26 (hereinafter “the remaining land No. 4 of this case”), and the remaining land No. 21, 27 (hereinafter “the remaining land No. 2” of this case as indicated in the same list No. 1 and No. 27 (hereinafter “the remaining land of this case”), together with the remaining land of Plaintiff A and B listed in the separate list of land No. 1 listed in the same list.
E. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on December 18, 2014 - Contents of adjudication: The plaintiffs’ value decline in the remaining land of this case.