A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Automobile Management Act may dismantle devices prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on any motor vehicle;

Nevertheless, at around 10:40 on March 21, 2014, the Defendant, along with D, cut off and dismantled the vehicle equipment, such as presses, sets, and nits, which was stolen by the B, using the coastal road located in the Geum-do, Geum-do, Geum-do, Geum-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Geumnam-do, G, to prevent the performance of the equipment of the vehicle from being maintained, such as presses, sets, and nits.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with B and C, dismantled an automobile without permission.

2. On March 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) from around 16:32 to around 17:10 on March 21, 2014, the Defendant: (b) was investigated by the senior judicial police officer H and the senior police officer I into suspicion of larceny; (c) stolen the personal information of his/her assistant police officer H and the senior police officer I; and (d) voluntarily signed the name column of the protocol of interrogation of a suspect; and (d) submitted the same to H and I, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant, without authority, forged the signature of the J and exercised the forged signature of the J.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning B and C;

1. Police seizure protocol, each photograph, and police interrogation protocol of the accused (as of March 21, 2014);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on internal investigation reports (related to the change of personal information A of a suspect);

1. Relevant law of criminal facts, Articles 80 subparagraph 4 and 35 of the Motor Vehicle Management Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and Article 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act (the point of private signature, forgery of a private signature, and the exercise of a private signature);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant committed the crime of this case, even though he was sentenced to imprisonment for 8 months for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act due to the crime of signatureation and fabrication in 2007.