A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant in collusion with wife C,

1. On July 29, 2012, at around 02:00, the difference in the difference in returning home by covering the remaining fruits, etc. after completing the business by the victim E in a tent in front of the Dmar, shall be reported to the network around, and the defendant shall take up a tent and walk up, and then, he shall take up the tent in an amount equivalent to the 80,000 won of the market price owned by the victim E in front of the Dmar, the sum of the market price of which is equivalent to the 143,000 won of the market price of the 15,000 won of the market price and the sum of the 15,000 won of the earth and sand boxes, etc. owned by the victim in front of the Dmar, and the sum of which is equivalent to the 60,000 won of the market price of the victim’s 20,000 won of the dmar, the market price of which is equivalent to the 60,00 billion won of the market price.

2. On July 31, 2012, around 02:04, at the display stand prior to the operation of the Victim G G in the vicinity of the said Dart, C reported the network in the vicinity, and C stolen the victims’ property by gathering food equivalent to KRW 479,50,00 in total at the market price of KRW 236,00,00 in the victim’s holding market price, when walking a tent and walking a tent, and the Defendant stolen the victims’ property by gathering food equivalent to KRW 479,50 in total at the market price of KRW 236,00,000 in the amount of KRW 22,50 in the market price of the victim’s holding price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E, F and G;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do139, Apr. 1, 201);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation);