Defendants shall be punished by each fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B are the relationship between South and North Korea.

On September 24, 2017, at the hospital located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S., U.S. on 19:10 on September 24, 2017, the Defendants jointly and severally stated in F in the indictment of 207, which was the spouse of the Defendant A, Defendant A and his family in the indictment of e, which was the spouse of the Defendant A, but in order to distinguish from the victim, E is indicated in E, Defendant A’s head, and Defendant A’s f(the age of 63). Defendant A knifeed the victim’s neck by taking the victim’s hand, and Defendant B knifeed the victim’s neck with his hand, and knifeed the victim’s knife with his hand.

Criminal facts

Some of them, namely, Defendant A’s “in order to take the Defendant’s Hah and go to the Defendant’s Hah” did not lack of evidence to acknowledge it, and the Defendants indicated the Victim’s Hah to “Hahh” as “Hah” only due to lack of evidence to acknowledge the fact that the Defendant Hahdd the Victim’s Hah,” (it is not a content to be acquitted in the text). Accordingly, the Defendants jointly carried out a plehy with the victim, who is a lineal ascendant of Defendant A, in need of approximately 14-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Part of the witness F’s legal statement (for Defendant B, part of F’s statement in the third protocol of the trial) (for Defendant B, although the witness F’s legal statement is partly contradictory to the situation at the time when the injury was inflicted, there is a consistent statement as to facts constituting an offense, and there is a little degree of division in the attitude of the statement, but overall lead is given, and the statement is consistent with objective circumstances or other evidence, and the part of the statement concerning facts constituting an offense can be sufficiently trusted);

1. 증인 G의 법정진술(피고인 A에 대하여는 제4회 공판조서 중 G의 진술기재) 증인 G의 진술은 그 태도나 진술 내용에 비추어 신빙성이 높고, 피해자의 목에 빨갛게 자국이 있었다고...