Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Criminal facts

1. On April 23, 2017, the Defendant of assault and assault: (a) at the Osung apartment parking lot located 27 a.m. on the top of the window of Changwon-si, Changwon-si on April 23, 2017; (b) where the Defendant is under the influence of alcohol to the victims C (36 years of age) who disembarked goods at the troke of the vehicle.

“The strings of the strings of the vehicles are buried “, close and strings of the strings of the vehicles.”

Accordingly, the victim's defect in 112 report, and the defendant "Isle several lives" to the victim;

Is high-speed;

The term "Illand" refers to the victim's cellular phone, which was used by the victim in his/her hand, has fallen the floor and inflicted violence on the victim's et al. one time by drinking.

2. Interference with performing public duties;

A. On April 23, 2017, at the above parking lot around 19:50 on April 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) from the security guards E (53) of the Changwon Police Station D police box called up after receiving a 112 report to the Defendant, the Defendant: (b) “The Defendant has assaulted the reporter.”

A person who is asked of “I”, “I am spherbling,” and assaulted E’s shoulder part at one time by drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

B. The Defendant was arrested in the act of committing the crime under suspicion of interference with the above performance of official duties, and was under investigation by being transferred to the police station DP station located in F of Changwon-si, Changwon-si around 20:03 on the same day, and was under investigation, G police officers who were on duty at the time of his duty with “Wet this son, I Ha I am I am I son.”

In this case, the slope H (43 tax) in which the case was handled is why the police will take a bath.

“Along with the Defendant’s restraint, the Defendant dumped the water deposited in the Ha’s face and assaulted the Ha’s h’s face.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and H:

1. C’s statement;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's defense counsel's assertion against each of the closure photographs and the defendant are physically and mentally weak at the time of each of the crimes in this case.